Komuniciranje znanosti: Praktični vodnik za raziskovalke in raziskovalce ter za vse, ki želite spodbujati radovednost

Al-Shamahi, E. (2025, 22. september). I'm a former creationist. Here's why 'follow the science' failed. The Washington Post.

Biel, J., in Brent, B. (2022). Make a Zine, Updated & Expanded, Start Your Own Underground Publishing Revolution. Microcosm Publishing, Portland, OR.

Brookshire, B. (2014). Cookie Science: Baking up a scientific experiment. Science News Explores. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/cookie-science-cookie-experiment

Bucchi, M. in Trench, B. (Ur.). (2021). Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (3. izd.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003039242

Burns, T. W., O'Connor, D. J. in Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625030122004

Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337(6102), 1623–1627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223416

Gopnik, A., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., & Glymour, C. (2001). Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.620

Hammersley, B. (2004, 12. februar). Audible revolution. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/feb/12/broadcasting.digitalmedia

Jowett, A. (2008). Podcasting science: A new tool for science communication. EMBO reports, 9(5), 398–401. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.58

Kahan, D. M. (2017). Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition. Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper Series, št. 164.

Kunaver, U., Muršič, Z., Robinson, J. A. in Romih, T. (2025). Občanska znanost v 5 korakih: Načrtovanje in oblikovanje projektov (P. Fašalek, Ur.). Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru. https://doi.org/10.18690/um.4.2025

Lastrucci, C. L. (1963). The Scientific Approach: Basic Principles of the Scientific Method. Schenkman Publishing Company.

Lukan, T. (2024). Make Science Go Viral. How to Effectively Communicate Research Through Short Form Video Formats on Social Media Platforms. Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society. https://graphite.page/short-video-guide

MacKenzie, L. E. (2019). Science podcasts: analysis of a global audience and podcast practices. Royal Society Open Science, 6(1), 180932. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180932

Medvecky, F. in Leach, J. (2019). An Ethics of Science Communication. Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32116-1

Nature Editorial. (2026). The future of science communication is not an article like this. Nature, 654(8117), 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-01723-1

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T. in Nielsen, R. K. (2026). Digital News Report 2026. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report

Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2025 (2025). Press release: Mary E. Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell in Shimon Sakaguchi za odkritja na področju periferne imunske tolerance. The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet.

Olson, R. (2015). Houston, We Have a Narrative: Why Science Needs Story. University of Chicago Press.

Rozenblit, L., in Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521–562.

Yong, E. (2021, 2. oktober). What Even Counts as Science Writing Anymore? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/10/how-pandemic-changed-science-writing/620271/